If you have any feedback on how we can make our new website better please do contact us. We would like to hear from you.
Wasting Precious Resources
5 kgs. Edible Grain & Soybeans = 1 kg. Beef
100,000 liters of water = 1 kg. Beef
2,000 liters of water = 1 kg. Soybeans
Grain-fed
livestock consume 100,000 liters of water for every kilogram of food
they produce, compared with 2,000 liters for soybeans.
Animal
protein also demands tremendous expenditures of fossil-fuel energy -
eight times as much as for a comparable amount of plant protein. Put
another way, says Pimentel, the average omnivore diet burns the
equivalent of a gallon of gas per day - twice what it takes to produce
a vegan diet.
Time Magazine, “Should You Be a Vegetarian?”, July 2002
Wasted Grain That Could Feed People
Livestock
feed uses 5 times more grain to produce a meal than eating it
directly. "There can be no question that more hunger can be alleviated
with a given quantity of grain by completely eliminating animals [from
the food production process]. About 2,000 pounds of concentrates
[grains] must be supplied to livestock in order to produce enough meat
and other livestock products to support a person for a year, whereas
400 pounds of grain (corn, wheat, rice, soybeans, etc.) eaten directly
will support a person for a year. Thus, a given quantity of grain eaten
directly will feed 5 times as many people as it will if it is first fed
to livestock and then is eaten indirectly by humans in the form of
livestock products...."
From
M. E. Ensminger, Ph.D., internationally recognized animal agriculture
specialist, former Department of Animal Science Chairman at Washington
State University, currently President of Consultants-Agriservices,
Clovis, California
EIGHT MEATY FACTS ABOUT ANIMAL FOOD
From "Livestock Production: Energy Inputs and the Environment", by David Pimentel
--
WHERE'S THE GRAIN? The 7 billion livestock animals in the United States
consume five times as much grain as is consumed directly by the entire
American population.
--
HERBIVORES ON THE HOOF. Each year an estimated 41 million tons of plant
protein is fed to U.S. livestock to produce an estimated 7 million tons
of animal protein for human consumption. About 26 million tons of the
livestock feed comes from grains and 15 million tons from forage crops.
For every kilogram of high-quality animal protein produced, livestock
are fed nearly 6 kg of plant protein.
--
FOSSIL FUEL TO FOOD FUEL. On average, animal protein production in the
U.S. requires 28 kilocalories (kcal) for every kcal of protein produced
for human consumption. Beef and lamb are the most costly, in terms of
fossil fuel energy input to protein output at 54:1 and 50:1,
respectively. Turkey and chicken meat production are the most efficient
(13:1 and 4:1, respectively). Grain production, on average, requires
3.3 kcal of fossil fuel for every kcal of protein produced. The U.S.
now imports about 54 percent of its oil; by the year 2015, that import
figure is expected to rise to 100 percent.
--
THIRSTY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. U.S. agriculture accounts for 87 percent of
all the fresh water consumed each year. Livestock directly use only 1.3
percent of that water. But when the water required for forage and grain
production is included, livestock's water usage rises dramatically.
Every kilogram of beef produced takes 100,000 liters of water. Some 900
liters of water go into producing a kilogram of wheat. Potatoes are
even less "thirsty," at 500 liters per kilogram.
--
HOME ON THE RANGE. More than 302 million hectares of land are devoted
to producing feed for the U.S. livestock population -- about 272
million hectares in pasture and about 30 million hectares for
cultivated feed grains.
--
DISAPPEARING SOIL. About 90 percent of U.S. cropland is losing soil --
to wind and water erosion -- at 13 times above the sustainable rate.
Soil loss is most severe in some of the richest farming areas; Iowa
loses topsoil at 30 times the rate of soil formation. Iowa has lost
one-half its topsoil in only 150 years of farming -- soil that took
thousands of years to form.
--
PLENTY OF PROTEIN: Nearly 7 million tons (metric) of animal protein is
produced annually in the U.S. -- enough to supply every American man,
woman and child with 75 grams of animal protein a day. With the
addition of 34 grams of available plant protein, a total of 109 grams
of protein is available per capita. The RDA (recommended daily
allowance) per adult per day is 56 grams of protein for a mixed diet.
--
OUT TO PASTURE. If all the U.S. grain now fed to livestock were
exported and if cattlemen switched to grass-fed production systems,
less beef would be available and animal protein in the average American
diet would drop from 75 grams to 29 grams per day. That, plus current
levels of plant-protein consumption, would still yield more than the
RDA for protein.
Animal
agriculture is a leading consumer of water resources in the United
States, Pimentel noted. Grain-fed beef production takes 100,000 liters
of water for every kilogram of food. Raising broiler chickens takes
3,500 liters of water to make a kilogram of meat. In comparison,
soybean production uses 2,000 liters for kilogram of food produced;
rice, 1,912; wheat, 900; and potatoes, 500 liters. "Water shortages
already are severe in the Western and Southern United States and the
situation is quickly becoming worse because of a rapidly growing U.S.
population that requires more water for all of its needs, especially
agriculture," Pimentel observed.
Livestock
are directly or indirectly responsible for much of the soil erosion in
the United States, the ecologist determined. On lands where feed grain
is produced, soil loss averages 13 tons per hectare per year. Pasture
lands are eroding at a slower pace, at an average of 6 tons per hectare
per year. But erosion may exceed 100 tons on severely overgrazed
pastures, and 54 percent of U.S. pasture land is being overgrazed.
"More
than half the U.S. grain and nearly 40 percent of world grain is being
fed to livestock rather than being consumed directly by humans,"
Pimentel said. "Although grain production is increasing in total, the
per capita supply has been decreasing for more than a decade. Clearly,
there is reason for concern in the future."
From:
David Pimentel, professor of ecology in Cornell University's College of
Agriculture and Life Sciences, reported at the July 24-26 meeting of
the Canadian Society of Animal Science in Montreal. 1997
The environmental impact of the meat industry.
In
a study listing the most harmful activities and products for the
environment, the meat industry was second, behind only automobiles.
"The
industrial production of beef, poultry and pork pollutes waterways and
air, fouls the land and gobbles up valuable resources, said Warren
Leon, deputy director of the Massachusetts environmental group. The
manufacture and use of cars and light trucks were at the top of the
list. ``That was about what we expected,'' Leon said. But Leon said
researchers were surprised when meat production showed up second only to vehicles in terms of environmental destruction.
``We knew meat production would have some kind of impact, but we didn't
expect it to be so significant.'' In terms of water pollution, said
Leon, beef is 17 times more damaging than all that goes into making
pasta. This is because of water pollution from manure, as well as the
amount of electrical energy, fuel, fertilizer and pesticides needed to
raise cattle fodder. ``The contamination to the nation's waterways
from manure run- off is extremely serious,'' he said. ``Twenty tons of
livestock manure are produced for every household in the country.
We have strict laws governing the disposal of human waste, but the
regulations are lax, or often nonexistent, for animal waste.'' Beef
production is also 20 times more damaging to wildlife habitat than
pasta production, said Leon, because it uses far more land."
Union of Concerned Scientists discussion from an article on the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle, April 27, 1999